Legal Opinion
Wigfall v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 10, 2005PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
After informing a correction officer that he could not provide a urine sample for testing, petitioner was observed urinating in a shower stall and admitted to defecating in a plastic bag. When confronted about his behavior, petitioner became loud and boisterous. He was charged in a misbehavior report with committing an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Borcsok v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Smith v. PortuondoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Green v. RicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Hernandez v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by9 opinions
- Abdul-Khaliq v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Infante v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Pulliam v. WhitmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Wahhab v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Shell v. Superintendent of Oneida Correctional FacilityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.