Bassett v. Lush

Response to Petition eor Rehearing by

Judge Turner.

*622By reason of a confused state of this record it was inadvertently and erroneously stated in the opinion (156 Ky., 490) that appellant claimed that appellee’s deed from Collard did not embrace the land in controversy, but conceded that same was embraced in the deeds from Jarboe to Simms, and from Simms on down to Collard.

On the contrary, as pointed out in the petition for rehearing, it is conceded that appellee’s deed to- Collard does embrace the land in controversy, and it is claimed that the prior deeds do not embrace it.

The deed from Collard…