Legal Opinion

Brock v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 16, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Van Sant, Commissioner

Reversing.

Appellants, Claude Brock, Cladus Daulton, and Floyd Sharpe, were convicted of the crime of confederating and banding together to go forth for the purpose of intimidating, alarming, injuring, and disturbing Hobart and Luther Daulton. Each was sentenced to imprisonment in the state reformatory for a period of one .year. They seek reversal on the grounds, (1) the evidence is not sufficient to support the jury’s verdict, and ■(2) the court erred in instructing the jury.

Appellants were returning from church when they «topped to drink from a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wood v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allen v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  2. Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API