Brock v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Van Sant, Commissioner
Reversing.
Appellants, Claude Brock, Cladus Daulton, and Floyd Sharpe, were convicted of the crime of confederating and banding together to go forth for the purpose of intimidating, alarming, injuring, and disturbing Hobart and Luther Daulton. Each was sentenced to imprisonment in the state reformatory for a period of one .year. They seek reversal on the grounds, (1) the evidence is not sufficient to support the jury’s verdict, and ■(2) the court erred in instructing the jury.
Appellants were returning from church when they «topped to drink from a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wood v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
3Cited by2 opinions
- Allen v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
- Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943