Legal Opinion

Weisenberg v. Miller

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided August 23, 1945No. File 72565PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtQuinlan, J.

The plaintiff was burned by a flash ignition from the lighting by a match of cigarette lighting fluid by the son of the defendants. The fluid was in the automobile of the defendant father for over a year and discovered by the plaintiff and defendants’ son while playing about the automobile in search of a soldier hat.

Of course, we must start with the proposition that parents are not liable for the torts of their children. Next, no claim of agency is made. Consequently, on .the theory of foreseeability, it is charged and claimed that the .conduct of the defendants was such that their personal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. RehbeinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  2. Hall v. . New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Hall v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Comunale v. Curtis, No. 086629 (Aug. 12, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API