Legal Opinion

Wray v. Pennsylvania R. Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

At chambers. On motion to make complaint more definite.

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

This is an action brought to recover the sum of $10,500, alleged to be the amount of certain penalties incurred by the defendant by reason of violations of the provisions of chapter 260 of the Laws of 1888. That act provides as follow's: “Section 1. Within thirty days after the passage of this act every person, corporation, or association owning, leasing, operating, or controlling any ferry in this state, of between this state and any other state, operating from or to a city of 50,000 inhabitants or over, shall post in a conspie'uous and accessible position, outside of and adjacent to each…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kee v. McSweeneyNew York Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Barker v. . New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Foote v. N.Y. Central and Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Fong HingDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API