Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Antar

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 25, 1994No. 93-5732, 93-5733 and 94-5006Unknown

1ConcurrenceRosenn, Circuit Judge

This case marks another effort by the press to test the outer limits of their right to gather and print news about all aspects of the judicial system and implicates the historic efforts of the courts to protect the confidentiality of a jury’s deliberative process. Our decision today recognizes the right of press access to the courts, including the right to interview jurors, but we reaffirm that this right is not absolute. The press’ right to interview jurors is separated by a delicate but important line between the permissible and the impermissible. We attempt to draw that line in this case.

I…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. United States v. Frank MotenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. SimoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API