Legal Opinion
Nike, Inc. v. Rubber Manufacturers Ass'n
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 27, 1981No. 80 Civ. 4990PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BONSAL, District Judge.
Defendant Brooks Shoe Manufacturing Co., Inc. (“Brooks”), one of the defendants and the counterclaim plaintiff herein, moves for a preliminary injunction against plaintiff and counterclaim defendant Nike, Inc. (“Nike”) pending the final hearing and determination of the counterclaim. The injunction would enjoin Nike from (a) authorizing, permitting, approving or in any manner causing Nike’s “swoosh-stripe” trademark symbol or the “Nike” name to be placed or affixed on athletic shoes (including baseball and football shoes) manufactured or distributed by shoe…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGregor-Doniger Inc. v. Drizzle Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Mushroom Makers, Incorporated v. R. G. Barry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Home Products Corp. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Patsy's Italian Restaurant, Inc. v. BanasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Classic Instruments, Inc. v. VDO-Argo Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Dillon v. DeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.