Legal Opinion

Spilman v. Mercer Co. Nat. B. of Harrodsburg

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 25, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Ratliff

Affirming in part and reversing in part.

TMs appeal involves the construction of a deed made by James C. Page to bimself as trustee of James P. Spilman, Ms wife, and the children they may have.

That part of the deed pertinent to the issue involved, reads as follows:

“This Indenture, made on the 17th day of September, A. D. One Thousand Eight Hundred and Ninety-four, by and between James C. Page, as Trustee of Mary E. Page, Mary E. Page and James C. Page of the city of St. .Louis, Missouri, parties of the first part, and said James C. Page as Trustee of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kentland Coal & Coke Co. v. KeenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Harkness v. LisleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Ford v. FordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Azarch v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bjorkman v. Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America of Diocese of LexingtonKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Morrison v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  3. Bjorkman v. Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America of Diocese of LexingtonKentucky Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API