Wilkins v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
The indictment alleged that Luther Edgar Sumrall with malice aforethought killed Arthur L. Wilkins by placing an automobile containing Wilkins on a railroad track so that he would be run over and killed by a railroad train, and that appellant prior to the commission of said offense with malice aforethought did "advise, command and encourage the said Luther Edgar Sumrall to commit said offense," the said appellant not being present when the offense was committed.
The confession of appellant was admitted in evidence. Unless said confession furnished direct evidence supporting the averments of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Langhorn, Jr. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Snow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Dyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.