Legal Opinion

N. Louis Stone v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 19, 1966No. 6658_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Taxpayers, husband and wife, seek to review a Tax Court decision disallowing amortization deductions taken in 1952 and 1953 (in the respective amounts of $7,-756.70 and $5,896.82) for premiums paid on the purchase of callable bonds.

The law applicable to this case is the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, Sections 23 (v) and 125. 1 The combined effect of these sections was to allow as a deduction from net income the difference between the purchase price of a bond (more accurately, the taxpayer’s basis in the event of sale) and the amount payable if the bond were called. 2

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Knetsch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Hanover Bank v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Commissioner v. KorellSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. United States v. General Geophysical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. United States v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crosby Valve & Gage Company (Formerly Crosby Steam Gage & Valve Company) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
  2. Santander Holdings USA, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  3. Fidelity International Currency Advisor a Fund, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  4. Santander Holdings USA, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API