Legal Opinion

In re Levy

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1976PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

We hold that section 234 of the Family Court Act is constitutional notwithstanding that it authorizes Family Court in New York City to direct parents of handicapped children, other than children who are blind or deaf, to contribute to the maintenance of such children in connection with their education.

*657Appellants are parents of three handicapped children,1 each of whom it is agreed is in need of special residential educational training and for none of whom does the City of New York have an appropriate educational facility. Each of the three children was attending a suitable private residential…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Hernandez v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. People v. DraytonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Board of Education v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Lujan v. Colorado State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. Alevy v. Downstate Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. IllardoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API