Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided October 18, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Senate Littlefield:

¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following questions:

1. The Oklahoma Statutes, 56 O.S. Supp. 1999, §§ 240.22[56-240.22], 240.22A-240.22D and 2000 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 384, §§ 19, 20 (codified as amended at 56 O.S. Supp. 2000, §§ 240.22E[56-240.22E], 240.22G), authorize the Department of Human Services (DHS) to levy against an obligor's accounts in financial institutions to collect past-due child support when the obligor is in "[n]oncompliance with an order for support" according to 56…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. AMF Tubescope Company v. HatchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. State of Kansas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. State of Kansas v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  4. Department of Human Services v. GlasbyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API