Legal Opinion

In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Kane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by John I. Kane and another, as executors, etc., of George A. Brandreth, deceased, from certain portions of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Westchester, entered in the office of said surrogate on the 27th day of October, 1900, settling and adjusting their accounts as such executors.

1Opinion of the Court

Sewell, J.:

One of the questions involved is whether the estate of. the testator is entitled to an apportionment of a dividend declared upon eleven shares of stock of the Porous Plaster Company on the 24th day of ISTovember, 1897. On the 2d day of. ISTovember, 1893, George A. Brandreth, the testator, transferred to his four daughters eleven shares of stock of the Porous Plaster Company, and they thereupon executed an instrument or power of attorney which recited that the transfer to them was made upon condition that the said George A. Brandreth “ is to- receive all dividends declared upon said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hopper v. . SageNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Kearney v. . CruikshankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Hyatt v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Hill v. . Newichawanick CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of PalmerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928
  2. In re the Estate of WanzerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942
  3. In re the Estate of AmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  4. Nirdlinger's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API