Mikkelsen v. Southtrust Bank of Baldwin County
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
The primary issue in this case is whether, in a suit against a guarantor of a promissory note, the trial judge correctly granted the bank a judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict.
SouthTrust Bank of Baldwin County (“SouthTrust”) sued Robert L. Mikkelsen on three promissory notes. Mikkelsen had executed two of the notes as primary obli-gor and the other as guarantor for one C.W. Spence (“Spence note”). The Spence *9note was executed to provide funds for Spence to buy a boat for use in his business. Spence, contemporaneously with his execution of the note, also executed a ship…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Handley v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Vulcan Oil Co., Inc. v. GormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Creative Leasing, Inc. v. CannonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986