Legal Opinion

Mikkelsen v. Southtrust Bank of Baldwin County

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 11, 1987No. 86-554Published

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

The primary issue in this case is whether, in a suit against a guarantor of a promissory note, the trial judge correctly granted the bank a judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict.

SouthTrust Bank of Baldwin County (“SouthTrust”) sued Robert L. Mikkelsen on three promissory notes. Mikkelsen had executed two of the notes as primary obli-gor and the other as guarantor for one C.W. Spence (“Spence note”). The Spence *9note was executed to provide funds for Spence to buy a boat for use in his business. Spence, contemporaneously with his execution of the note, also executed a ship…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Handley v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Vulcan Oil Co., Inc. v. GormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Creative Leasing, Inc. v. CannonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API