Legal Opinion

Hejduk v. Snyder

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 1, 1919No. 8842PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from County Court, Noble County; A. Duff Tillery, Judge. Proceedings by Yaelov Hejduk against Fred Snyder. From the judgment on a verdict for defendant in a trial de novo in the county court, on appeal from a judgment of a justice of the peace, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This controversy arose by the plaintiff in error restraining certain stock of the defendant in error that was trespassing upon plaintiff’s premises, and proceeding in accordance with sections 153 and 154, Rev. Laws of 1910, to have the justice of the peace assess the damages. The damages as assessed by the justice of the peace were less than $20. The defendant appealed from the assessment of damages made by the justice of the peace, as provided in section 154, to the county court of Noble county. In the county court, the plaintiff in error moved to dismiss ’ the appeal, for the reason the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ellis v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Romney v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. McCown v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API