Legal Opinion

In re Reilly

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 9, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.

Three citizens of New Jersey brought this action pursuant to N.J.S.A. 1:7-1 to -7 for a declaration that chapter 364 of the Laws of 2001, subsequently codified as N.J.S.A 18A:36-34, is void because it was not enacted in the manner required by the New *521Jersey Constitution.1 The applicants contend that chapter 364 is void because the Governor conditionally vetoed a substantially similar bill in the same legislative session and the Legislature did not adopt the changes recommended in the Governor’s veto message or override the veto by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meadowlands Regional Redevelopment Agency v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. In Re Forsythe ApplicationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. In Re Application of McCabeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. In Re Application of McGlynnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Application of Barbara Eames, Etc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API