Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 8, 2008No. AC 28154PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Bobby Peterson, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that his habeas counsel did not provide ineffective assistance. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The following procedural history is relevant to the issues on appeal. The petitioner was arrested on May 5,1990, and charged in four separate informations with numerous sexual assaults. During the course of his criminal trial, after one of his victims had testified, the *779petitioner…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Henderson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. Burtoff v. FarisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Pagan v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Com. v. Brennan, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. Peterson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API