District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne
Supreme Court of the United States
1Concurrence
Justice Alito,
with whom Justice Kennedy joins, and with whom Justice Thomas joins as to Part II, concurring.
Respondent was convicted for a brutal sexual assault. At trial, the defense declined to have DNA testing done on a semen sample found at the scene of the crime. Defense counsel explained that this decision was made based on fear that the testing would provide further evidence of respondent’s guilt. After conviction, in an unsuccessful attempt to obtain parole, respondent confessed in detail to the crime. Now, respondent claims that he has a federal constitutional right to test the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.