James Houston Roughton v. State of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida
1DissentQuince, J.
A defendant’s right not to be placed in jeopardy more than once for the same offense is personal to that defendant. In order to determine if a particular defendant’s right has been- .violated, we. must start -with an ..analysis • .of the charges against that defendant — not what is potentially chargeable under a particular statute. Thus, section 775.021(4)(a), Florida Statutes — -which requires a double jeopardy analysis to be conducted without regard to the specific charges against a defendant or which charges have been proven — is antithetical to the purpose and meaning of the' double…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Seagrave v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- State v. HightowerSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Gibbs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- State v. ConnellySupreme Court of Florida · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.