Legal Opinion · Dissent

James Houston Roughton v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 25, 2016No. SC12-1719Published

1DissentQuince, J.

A defendant’s right not to be placed in jeopardy more than once for the same offense is personal to that defendant. In order to determine if a particular defendant’s right has been- .violated, we. must start -with an ..analysis • .of the charges against that defendant — not what is potentially chargeable under a particular statute. Thus, section 775.021(4)(a), Florida Statutes — -which requires a double jeopardy analysis to be conducted without regard to the specific charges against a defendant or which charges have been proven — is antithetical to the purpose and meaning of the' double…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Seagrave v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. State v. HightowerSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  4. Gibbs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  5. State v. ConnellySupreme Court of Florida · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API