Legal Opinion

Arps v. Seelow

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 5, 1991No. 90-2303PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

Frederick Seelow and his insurer, American Family Mutual Insurance Company, appeal a judgment declaring that coverage exists for an accident which occurred while Andrea Fountain was driving Seelow's car without his express or implied permission. We conclude that because she was an adult member of Seelow's household, Fountain had permission to use the car by operation of sec. 632.32, Stats.

Fountain was the sometime live-in mate of Seelow. Seelow owned a Thunderbird automobile insured by American Family. One evening when the two were out at a tavern, Fountain took Seelow's car and was involved…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Matter of Estate of BilsieCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  3. Derusha v. Iowa National Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Raymond v. Century Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Home Insurance Co. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  2. Carrell v. WolkenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  3. Venerable v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  4. Grange Insurance v. StumpfCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API