Legal Opinion

State v. Mattison

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Ward county; Palda, Jr., J. Martin Mattison and others were convicted of shooting with intent to kill, and appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtEngerud, J.

The three defendants were arraigned on an information which was apparently designed to charge them jointly with the crime of shooting another with intent to kill, as defined in section 7115, Rev. Codes 1899. They demurred to the information, and *392thereby challenged its sufficiency because it did not substantially conform to the requirements of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and charged more than one offense. The demurrer was overruled, and the defendants entered pleas of not guilty. The jury returned a verdict finding the three defendants “guilty of an assault with a dangerous weapon with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. State v. CruikshankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. MarcksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. State v. RobbinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1877
  5. State v. HooksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. John Gund Brewing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  3. State v. BednarNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API