Legal Opinion

Mansfield v. First National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1893No. 540Published

Appeal from Superior Court, Whateom County.

1Opinion

ON PETITION POR RE-HEARING.

Stiles, J.

Criticism is made of the opinion in this case because it is therein said that the Oregon statute contained *675no provision for the discharge of the debtor or for change of the assignee. This will have to be qualified. The Iowa statute dates back to 1857, and perhaps earlier. We have not the session laws of Oregon which contain the enactments in that state upon this subject. But from the notes to 2 Hill’s Code, chap. 28, we find that in 1878 the Iowa statute seems to have been adopted in Oregon verbatim, and this statute, without any provision for discharge of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Helm v. GilroyOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Jacobs Bros. & Co. v. ErvinOregon Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Stout v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Gammons v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API