Reddick v. Strickland
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Cairo — Judge Rigsby. November 24, 1919.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
1. “Exceptions pendente lite cannot be considered unless error is assigned thereon either in the main bill of exceptions or in the reviewing court by counsel for plaintiff in error before argument begins.’’ Jones v. State, 21 Ga. App. 22 (1) (93 S. E. 514). See also Kent v. State, 18 Ga. App. 30 (88 S. E. 913) ; Shaw v. Jones, 133 Ga. 446 (66 S. E. 240) Nicholls v. Popwell, 80 Ga. 604 (9) (6 S. E. 21). The bill of exceptions in this case recites that exceptions pendente lite were ■ duly taken to the overruling of a special demurrer and to the over*276ruling of a motion to strike an amendment to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shaw v. Jones, Newton & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Hawkins v. StuddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Nicholls v. PopwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Cooper v. ChambleeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Kent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kirkland v. BrewtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Clark v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- White County Bank v. Clermont State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Hamrick v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- First Bancredit Corp. v. J. G. McKenzie Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.