Legal Opinion

Bean v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 20, 1890Published

Appeal by defendant from an order of the municipal court of St. Paul, refusing a new trial after trial by the court and judgment of $171.48 ordered for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

Defendant is the assignee of Blissenbach & Zelzer by an assignment which, it is admitted, was void on its face. It was dated June 19, 1888, and under it the defendant took possession of t'he assigned property, and converted it into money as assignee, and held the same in his hands on the 15th day of June, 1889. On the 14th day of June, 1889, Degraw and others had recovered a valid judgment against the assignors, Blissenbach & Zelzer, upon a complaint filed May 23, 1889, more than twenty days prior to such judgment, which they were therefore entitled to enforce against the property of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API