Legal Opinion

Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. Medical Technology & Research Authority

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 4, 2000No. 93,084, 93,085Published

1Opinion of the Court

4 P.3d 677 (2000)

2000 OK 23

OKLAHOMA CITY URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY, a public body corporate, Appellee,

v.

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH AUTHORITY OF OKLAHOMA, a statutory agency of the State of Oklahoma, Defendant,

Forrest "Butch" Freeman, Oklahoma County Treasurer, Appellant,

The City of Oklahoma City, a political subdivision of the State of Oklahoma; Independent School District No. 89; Vo-Tech School District No. 22; Metropolitan Library System of Oklahoma County; City-County Health Department of Oklahoma County, Defendants,

Board of Commissioners of Oklahoma County, Appellant.

Nos. 93,084,…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. State Ex Rel. York v. TurpenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Ethics Commission v. CullisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Cowart v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API