Legal Opinion

State v. Kanter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 28, 1973No. 72-182PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon a review of the certificate forwarded to us pursuant to Rule 4.6, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., and an examination of the applicable authorities, we must respectfully decline to answer the question. Boyer v. City of Orlando, Fla.1970, 232 So.2d 169; First National Bank & T. Co. v. Great American Ins. Co., Fla.App.1972, 257 So.2d 73; In re Adoption of Taylor, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 476; City of Hollywood v. Peck, Fla.1952, 57 So.2d 842; Laytner v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 857; State v. Harris, Fla.1962, 136 So.2d 633. The question presented to us is one which the trial court has the power to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  2. Boyer v. City of OrlandoSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  3. Laytner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  5. In re Adoption by TaylorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Iorio v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. State v. GutierrezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API