Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 12, 1991No. 90-1251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

Appellant’s conviction is affirmed. Because, however, the habitual felony offender sentence imposed under Section 775.-084(l)(a)l, Florida Statutes (1989), is not supported by sequential convictions, appellant’s sentence is reversed and the case remanded for resentencing. Fuller v. State, 578 So.2d 887 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), petition for review filed, No. 77,907 (Fla. May 10,1991); Razz v. State, 576 So.2d 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), petition for review filed, No. 77,761 (Fla. Apr. 16, 1991). Accord Barnes v. State, 576 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), petition for review filed, No.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Fuller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Razz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API