Martin v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.
Appellant’s conviction is affirmed. Because, however, the habitual felony offender sentence imposed under Section 775.-084(l)(a)l, Florida Statutes (1989), is not supported by sequential convictions, appellant’s sentence is reversed and the case remanded for resentencing. Fuller v. State, 578 So.2d 887 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), petition for review filed, No. 77,907 (Fla. May 10,1991); Razz v. State, 576 So.2d 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), petition for review filed, No. 77,761 (Fla. Apr. 16, 1991). Accord Barnes v. State, 576 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), petition for review filed, No.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Fuller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Razz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992