Legal Opinion

Otteson v. Malone

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1978No. 15478PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

The plaintiffs commenced these proceedings seeking rescission of an option contained in a lease. The defendants counterclaimed for specific performance of the option. Defendant’s appeal from a decision of the court declaring the option invalid. We reverse and remand with instructions to order specific performance for defendants, pursuant to the terms of the contract. No costs awarded.

Prior to June 27, 1974, the defendants had purchased from the plaintiffs 10 acres of land without water rights. On June 27, 1974, the plaintiffs and defendants entered into a lease of 28 acres of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pope Manufacturing Co. v. GormullySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Greener v. GreenerUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Jardine v. ArchibaldUtah Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Marzano v. Proficio Mortgage Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  3. Property Assistance Corp. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Nilson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NADistrict Court, D. Utah · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API