Legal Opinion
Arclightz and Films Pvt. Ltd. v. Video Palace Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 15, 2003No. 01 Civ. 10135(SAS)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Arclightz and Films Pvt. Ltd. (“Arclightz”) and Enzo Pictures Ltd. (“Enzo”), respectively the producer and distributor of the Indian motion picture Asoka, have asserted that Video Palace Inc. and Muhammad Pervez, individually and d/b/a “Video Palace” (collectively, “Video Palace”), infringed their rights by duplicating, renting and selling unauthorized copies of Asoka. 1 On June 2, 2003, this Court granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs against Video Palace. 2 Plaintiffs now seek recovery from Video Palace for statutory damages…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lloyd Lieb, Trading as Specialized Cassettes v. Topstone Industries, Inc., and D. Robbins & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Knitwaves, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Lollytogs Ltd. (Inc.) D/B/A French Toast, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Washington Shoe Company v. A-Z Sporting Goods IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Capitol Records v. Rita CarmichaelDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
- Lyons Partnership, L.P. v. D & L Amusement & Entertainment, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Erickson Productions, Inc. v. Kraig KastCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Virgin Records America, Inc. v. LaceyDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.