Legal Opinion

Walter Filipek v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc., and Third Party and Eastern Rigging Corp., Third Party

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 11, 1958No. 25096_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

258 F.2d 734

Walter FILIPEK, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MOORE-McCORMACK LINES, Inc., Defendant and Third Party

Plaintiff-Appellee, and EASTERN RIGGING CORP.,

Third Party Defendant-Appellant.

No. 374, Docket 25096.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 14, 1958.

Decided Aug. 11, 1958.

James W. Forsyth, St. George, S.I., N.Y. (Jack Steinman, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Walter X. Connor, New York City (Charles N. Fiddler, Thomas F. Feeney, and Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York, City, on the brief), for defendant and third party plaintiff-appellee.

Edmund F.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Wilkerson v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Webb v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Stone v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API