Legal Opinion

Hanson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1889No. 2547PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Kimble. Tried below before the Hon. A. W. Moursund. This conviction was for the theft of a cow, the property of L. P. Dodson. The penalty assessed by the verdict was a term two years in the penitentiary. J. J. Stockbridge was the first witness for the State.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of Kimble. Tried below before the Hon. A. W. Moursund. This conviction was for the theft of a cow, the property of L. P. Dodson. The penalty assessed by the verdict was a term two years in the penitentiary. J. J. Stockbridge was the first witness for the State. He testified, in substance, that he was in the employ of one Bybee, in Kimble county, on the first day of April, 1887. On the morning of that day, the defendant," armed with Bybee’s gun, rode up to Bybee’s camp, and Bvbee asked him if he had “found that beef.” Defendant replied that he had found one that…

1Opinion of the Court

Hurt, Judge.

This conviction is for theft of a cow, the alleged property of L. P. Dodson. Upon the trial the State introduced as a witness one Stockbridge, who was evidently an accomplice. He swore to facts which very cogently criminated the defendant, but, being an accomplice, was he sufficiently corroborated F

The cow was alleged to be the property of L. P. Dodson. There is not the slightest testimony in this record, save that of Stockbridge, which tends to prove that the animal belonged to Dodson, or that Dodson had lost or missed the cow. Upon the issue of ownership the accomplice must be…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Manley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Ingram v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API