Legal Opinion

Florida Ex Rel. Butterworth v. Southland Corp.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided April 29, 1988No. 88-0273-CIVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION

SCOTT, District Judge.

Plaintiff, State of Florida, moves for an order requiring witness Elmer Bielick to state the basis for refusal to answer questions. In the context of the motion, two legal issues are raised:(1) Whether a witness must state the specific basis for his objection on the record where he raises a constitutional objection/ privilege?(2) Whether counsel may invoke a witness’ privilege against self-incrimination or whether the witness must personally invoke the privilege?

The first question is relatively simple; the second question is more difficult and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paul Bigby v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Cruz v. Workers Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. REPUBLIC OF TURKEY v. CICEKDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API