Legal Opinion

Kimball v. Continental Oil Company

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1976No. 13194PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE JOHN C. HARRISON

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court, Blaine Bounty, affirming the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Division of the Department of Labor and Industry of the state of Montana, awarding compensation.

This case began with an Industrial Accident Board Accident-Injury Investigation report filed with the Board on June 19, 1973. A copy of the report riled with the Board was sent to Continental Oil Company, whose consignee Richard Brainard had its bulk plant in Chinook, Montana, where the accident occurred.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hurlbut v. Vollstedt Kerr CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State Ex Rel. Ferguson v. District Court of Eighteenth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Lewis v. Anaconda CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Cartwright v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Deleary v. Anaconda Aluminum Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robins v. Anaconda Aluminum Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bond v. St. Regis Paper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Skrukrud v. Gallatin Laundry Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. McAlear v. Arthur G. McKee & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Smith v. Pierce Packing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API