Legal Opinion

Midgett v. . Nelson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The question presently presented is whether the instrument in suit covers liability for torts committed by the Assistant Fisheries Commissioner colore officii. Warren v. Boyd, 120 N. C., 56, 26 S. E., 700. This question was specifically left open on the former appeal, as the name of the Assistant Commissioner did not then appear in the schedule of the agreement. 212 N. C., 41. The record now discloses that his name does appear therein, and that the amount of the coverage of the bond at the time of plaintiff’s' injury was $1,000.

By the terms of the bond in suit it is stipulated that The Great…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brick Co. v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Midgett v. . NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Warren v. BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. City of Washington v. Trust Co. of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Murray v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1847

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Price v. . HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Langley v. PatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Jordan v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. State ex rel. Price v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Woodard v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API