Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Knox
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 3, 1975No. 21,531-APublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
The issue in this case is whether the prohibition against double jeopardy contained in the United States and Oregon Constitutions① applies in juvenile proceedings. The question arose in the following way.
In a petition filed June 12, 1974, in juvenile *457court, Knox was accused of attempted rape, in violation of ORS 163.375.② At the commencement of the hearing on the charge on July 2, 1974, the state moved to amend the petition to charge Knox with sexual abuse in the first degree in violation of ORS 163.425,③ rather than attempted rape. This motion was objected to by defense counsel and denied by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Roneika S.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State Ex Rel Juv. Dept. of Multnomah Cty. v. KCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.