Legal Opinion

In re Austin Trust

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAYLOR, Judge:

The fundamental issue in these consolidated appeals is whether the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County acted within its authority when, on August 1, 1995, it corrected its order of January 25, 1995, to conform to the opinion that had accompanied the earlier order. Finding that the court possessed the authority to act as it did, we affirm.

The matter before the court involved objections filed by Charlotte S. Austin (“Appellant”) and by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (“the Commonwealth”) to the First and Partial Account and the Audit Statement of the trustees of the C. Robert…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ColeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Daywalt v. Montgomery HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Key Automotive Equipment Specialists, Inc. v. AbernethySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. NicodemusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Mun. C., Mun. of Monroeville v. KlukoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WesleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. WesleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Roccograndi v. Temple University Health System, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API