Legal Opinion

Russell v. City of Sioux City

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 12, 1940No. 45056PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

Sixth street, in Sioux City, extends east and west. It is intersected at right angles by Pierce and Nebraska streets.' The two last-mentioned streets are a block apart, and midway between them a north and south alley also intersects sixth street. Plaintiff claims that, walking east upon the sidewalk on the north side of Sixth street, he came to the alley intersection; that there he paused momentarily to see whether a car approaching from the east would be turned into the alley; that then starting across the intersection he took one step whereupon his foot slipped and he fell, sustaining…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ford v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Hodges v. City of WaterlooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Staples v. City of SpencerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  4. Griffin v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Dodds v. West LibertySupreme Court of Iowa · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ryan v. City of EmmetsburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. City of Houston v. HagmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. McCormick v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API