Legal Opinion

Rupe v. Durbin Durco, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 2, 1976PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID T. WALKER, Special Judge.

These product liability actions were premised upon strict liability in tort under Restatement 402(a). They were consolidated for trial before a jury which resolved the issues in favor of the plaintiffs.

The defendant’s appeal presents two legal questions of first impression in the State of Tennessee. First, whether a post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding a verdict, pursuant to Rule 50.02 of the Rules of Tennessee Civil Procedure, should be considered to be a complete substitute for a motion for new trial. Second, whether the Tennessee Workmen’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tyrus v. Kansas City, Ft. Scott & Memphis RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Brenizer v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Cohen v. NoelTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Lackey v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  5. Citizens Trust Co. v. Service Motor Car Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ridings v. Ralph M. Parsons Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bradley v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  3. Crosslin v. AlsupTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Whalum v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. Taylor v. Academy Iron & Metal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API