Legal Opinion

Duran v. Goff Group

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 6, 2009No. 2070763Published

1Opinion of the Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

In Taliaferro v. Goff Group, 947 So.2d 1073 (Ala.Civ.App.2006), this court consid*46ered an appeal from a judgment of the Shelby Circuit Court determining that under § 25-5-82, Ala.Code 1975, a portion of the Alabama Workers’ Compensation Act (“the Act”), no compensation benefits were payable to the dependents of Luis Martinez Silva (“the employee”), i. e., Reynalda Alanis Duran, Martin Martinez Alanis, and Carlos Martinez Alanis (collectively, “the dependents”), on account of the employee’s death. We reversed the trial court’s judgment on purely procedural grounds in Goff,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Verdugo-UrquidezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Pedrazza v. Sid Fleming Contractor, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Gregutis v. Waclark Wire WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  4. Baughn v. Little Cahaba Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. De Ayala v. Florida Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API