Legal Opinion

Reed v. Young

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Greene Circuit Court. — Hon. James T. Neville, Judge. (1) The court erred-in forcing a compulsory reference herein and thereby depriving defendant of her constitutional right to a trial by jury. Thomas v. Reab, 6 Wend. 503; Van Rensalear v. Jewett, 6 Hill, 373; Silsmer v. Redfield, 19 Wend. 21; Brick v. Republic Co., 2 N. Y. Sup. Ct. 550; McCullough v. Brodie, 13 How. Pr. 346; Thornton v. Ins. Co., 7 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Greene Circuit Court. — Hon. James T. Neville, Judge. (1) The court erred-in forcing a compulsory reference herein and thereby depriving defendant of her constitutional right to a trial by jury. Thomas v. Reab, 6 Wend. 503; Van Rensalear v. Jewett, 6 Hill, 373; Silsmer v. Redfield, 19 Wend. 21; Brick v. Republic Co., 2 N. Y. Sup. Ct. 550; McCullough v. Brodie, 13 How. Pr. 346; Thornton v. Ins. Co., 7 Mo. App. 544; McMartin v. Bingham, 27 Iowa, 234; Townsend v. Hendricks, 40 How. Pr. 143; Evans v. Kalbfleisch, 16 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 13; Dewey v. Field, 13 How. Pr. 437; Ross v. Mayor,…

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

I

BOND, J.

Reference. (After stating the facts as above). — ■ We do not understand it to be now claimed that the statute permitting a trial court, upon the application of either party or of its own motion, to direct a reference in the cases specified, of any specific question of fact or the whole issues is an unconstitutional enactment, since that point has been heretofore disapproved. [Tinsley v. Kemery, 170 Mo. l. c. 317; Ice Co. v. Max Tamm, 138 Mo. 385.] But we take ^ p0gj^0n 0f appellant to be, that the statute (R. S. 1909, sec. 1996) has. been unconstitutionally applied in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Camp v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Creve Coeur Lake Ice Co. v. TammSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  3. Kenneth Investment Co. v. National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Hamlin v. WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  5. Andrus v. Home Insurance Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mecartney v. Guardian Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  2. Durwood v. DubinskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Klingenberg Son v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Jackson Exchange Bank v. RussellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Estes v. FrancisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API