Legal Opinion
United States v. Randolph Gerard Curnew
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 13, 1986No. 85-1869PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAGG, Circuit Judge.
Randolph Curnew appeals the judgment of the district court entered on his conditional plea of guilty to a charge of being unlawfully present in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We affirm.
On February 22, 1985, Curnew was indicted by a Nebraska grand jury under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Section 1326 forbids an alien who has previously been arrested and deported from the United States from reentering this country without first obtaining the consent of the Attorney General. Id. § 1326(1)-(2)(A). A previously deported alien who fails to obtain permission may avoid…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. DeLunaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. DodgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. UdeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Ex Parte PeroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Dewitt Dillon, Cross-Appellants v. The State of Montana, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dang Vang Yia Moua Yang Xiong Maichao Vang v. Vang Xiong X. Toyed, Individually and in His Capacity as Refugee CounselorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Hannah v. City of OverlandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Jose Trinidad Terrazas-CarrascoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- David Hannah v. City Of OverlandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Robert E. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.