Legal Opinion
Timothy D. Thomas v. Timothy D. Schaeffer, et al.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 17, 2026No. 3:24-cv-01603Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TIMOTHY D. THOMAS, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:24-cv-01603 v. (SAPORITO, J.) TIMOTHY D. SCHAEFFER, et al., Defendants. ORDER The defendants have timely filed a Rule 54(b) motion for reconsideration of our order granting in part and denying in part their Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss this action for failure to state a claim. Doc. 33; Doc. 34; Doc. 37; Doc. 38. Because the defendants’ motion seeks reconsideration of an interlocutory order, it is necessarily brought pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 ,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Virginia v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. Bernard Jerry, and Edgar SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Auto Services Co., Inc. v. KPMG, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Sue C. Wagoner, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Robert J. Wagoner, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.