Legal Opinion
Harold Lloyd Corporation v. Witwer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 10, 1933No. 6398Published
1Opinion of the Court
65 F.2d 1 (1933)
HAROLD LLOYD CORPORATION et al.
v.
WITWER.
No. 6398.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 10, 1933.
Robert C. Gortner, of Beverly Hills, Cal., Max Felix, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Alfred Sutro and Eugene M. Prince, both of San Francisco, Cal. (Lawler & Degnan, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellants and cross-appellees.
Harold A. Fendler and Ingle Carpenter, both of Los Angeles, Cal. (Benjamin F. Bledsoe, C. P. McCarthy, and Hill, Morgan & Bledsoe, all of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for appellee and…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Callaghan v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.