Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Goodes

U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review

Decided November 19, 1991No. CGCMS 24011; Docket No. 980PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUM, Chief Judge:

This case was submitted initially on its merits without specific assignment of error. Subsequently, the following issue was specified for briefing by the Court:

Was failure of the law specialist to respond to the defense assertions of 10 April 1991 error which materially prejudiced a substantial right? See U.S. v. Craig, 28 M.J. 321, 324 (C.M.A.1989). If so, what remedy is required, if any?

Court order dated 12 August 1991.

The following assignment was submitted in response to the specified issue:

FAILURE OF THE LAW SPECIALIST TO RESPOND TO THE DEFENSE ASSERTIONS OF 10 APRIL…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. CraigUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. NorrisU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. PayneU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. TownsendU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. CrawfordU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. HynesU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  4. United States v. HynesU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API