Legal Opinion

Chandler v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 29, 1963No. 22016PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Justice.

Grounds 1 and 2 of the amended motion complain that the trial judge omitted reference to Code Ann. § 27-1503 (Ga. L. 1952, p. 205) and Code § 26-301 from his charge to the jury. The provisions of each of the statutes are applicable where there is an issue as to whether the defendant is insane or incompetent to commit the crime charged in the indictment.

In the case sub judice while the testimony of the defendant’s witnesses was in conflict as to whether he was a person of average or low intelligence, there was no evidence, nor inference that could be drawn from the evidence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Swain v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Culberson v. Alabama Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Cobb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  5. Stone Mountain Confederate Monumental Ass'n v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pass v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Georgia Power Co. v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Walters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Gribble v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API