McGavic v. McGavic
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
These are cross appeals filed by a husband and wife from the order of the lower court awarding the wife $140.00 per week support. The husband contends that the lower court erred in determining that his wife was entitled to support, and the wife contends that order entered in her favor was inadequate. We agree with the lower court that the wife has met her burden of proof in showing that she is entitled to support. After reviewing all the evidence, however, we do not believe that the award of $140.00 per week was an adequate order.
Appellant-wife commenced this action…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth ex rel. Gitman v. GitmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth ex rel. Kallen v. KallenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth ex rel. Fryling v. FrylingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth ex rel. Lipsky v. LipskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth ex rel. Slossberg v. SlossbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Bishop v. BishopSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Boni v. BoniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Jenkins v. JenkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Shovlin v. ShovlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Estate of Robert F. Iversen, Deceased. Pittsburgh National Bank, Agent for John D. Iversen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.