Legal Opinion

Williams v. Bryan

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1887No. 2308PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Anderson. Tried below before, the Hon. E. A. Williams.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

Appellee brought suit in the court below against appellants upon a promissory note. To the (petition appellant Williams filed the following plea: “And for ■answer the said T. J. Williams says that the contract sued on is usurious and unlawful, in this, that defendant did pay to plaintiff’s agents two and one-half dollars of the money received by drim on the loan of six hundred dollars, to pay for negotiating said loan. Wherefore, he says he did not receive from plaintiffs *596in fact six hundred dollars, to draw twelve per cent interest per annum, but five hundred and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kent v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1807
  2. Dickey v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bomar v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Ballard v. ShockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Texas Loan Agency v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Hughes v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  5. Groves v. National Loan & Investment Co. of DetroitCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API