Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Koken
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
*634Dissenting opinion by
Judge SIMPSON.
I respectfully dissent from the thoughtful majority and concurring opinions. I dissent because I believe that mandatory arbitration of uninsured motorist (UM) and underinsured (UIM) motorist disputes violates the constitutional right to a jury trial.
Our Supreme Court has long recognized that compulsory arbitration is unconstitutional when it infringes upon the right to a jury trial. Application of Smith, 381 Pa. 223, 112 A.2d 625 (1955), app. dismissed sub nom., Smith v. Wissler, 350 U.S. 858, 76 S.Ct. 105, 100 L.Ed. 762 (1955).
Article 1, § 6 of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Smith CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Wertz v. Chapman TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. One (1) 1984 Z-28 Camaro CoupeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Hood's Executors v. NesbitSupreme Court of the United States · 1792
- Smith v. WisslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.