Legal Opinion

Roe v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided April 15, 1965No. Docket No. 92511Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Harold Roe and Charlotte Roe v. Commissioner.

Roe v. Commissioner

Docket No. 92511.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1965-100; 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 230; 24 T.C.M. (CCH) 528; T.C.M. (RIA) 65100;

April 15, 1965

Dale Forbes and Melvyn M. Ryan, for the petitioners. H. Kent Holman, for the respondent.

FAY

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

FAY, Judge: The Commissioner determined deficiencies in petitioners' income tax, as follows:

Taxable Year

Amount

1956

$2,093.79

1957

1,832.60

1958

2,551.61

By an Amendment to Answer, the Commissioner determined that there were increased deficiencies, as follows:

Taxable…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burnet v. LoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Westover v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  3. Estate of Scharf v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  4. Burr Oaks Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
  5. W. M. Ritter Lumber Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API