Legal Opinion
Churchill v. Malek
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 3, 2011PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.), entered March 24, 2010, which, upon reargument, vacated so much of an order, same court and Justice, dated October 30, 2009, as directed plaintiff to produce authorizations releasing his mental health and pharmaceutical records for an in camera review, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Given that, in this personal injury action, there is no claim to recover damages for emotional or psychological injury (see Valerio v Staten Is. Hosp., 220 AD2d 580 [1995]), or aggravation of a preexisting emotional or mental condition (see Sternberger…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zimmer v. Cathedral School of St. Mary & St. PaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Sternberger v. OffenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Zhi Fang Shi v. SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Valerio v. Staten Island HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Carr v. 583-587 Broadway AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alford v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- RICE, RICHARD J. v. CORASANTI, M.D., JAMES G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Serra v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Jones v. FEGS-WeCARE/Human Resources, NYCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of Shahid v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.